雅思写作重点词汇总结动物保护类 本文关键词：雅思，词汇，写作，动物，重点
雅思写作重点词汇总结动物保护类 本文简介：动物类题目1.动物实验2.保护野生动物3.饲养宠物4.动物园是否有用？5.动物是衣服和食物的来源6.动物作为食物61.vivisection活体解剖2.perexperimentsonanimals在动物身上做试验3.testanimals用于实验的动物4.besubjectedtoexperime
雅思写作重点词汇总结动物保护类 本文内容：
动物类题目
1.动物实验
2.保护野生动物
3.饲养宠物
4.动物园是否有用？
5.动物是衣服和食物的来源
6.动物作为食物
6
1.vivisection活体解剖
2.per
experiments
on
animals在动物身上做试验
3.test
animals用于实验的动物
4.be
subjected
to
experiments被迫接受试验
5.animal
rights动物权利
6.clinical
research临床研究
7.cruel残忍的
8.extremist极端主义者
9.medical
research医学研究
10.origin
of
species物种起源
11.alternative
替代的方法
12.biological
diversity生物多样性
13.natural
balance自然平衡
14.equilibrium
of
ecosystem生态平衡
15.coexistence共存
16.endangered
animals濒危动物
17.diversity
of
species物种多样性
18.shameless令人羞愧的
19.barbaric野蛮的
20.live
and
let
live活着就是与万物共存
21.meaningless没有意义的
22.dominant
species优势物种
23.laboratory实验室
24.vaccine疫苗
25.infringement践踏
26.right
to
live生存权
27.torture折磨
28.anti-science反科学的
29.life-threatening
diseases危及生命的疾病
30.scientific
gains科学成果
31.an
ever-lasting
theme一个永恒的主题
32.evolution进化
33.computer
simulation电脑模拟
34.groundless没有理由的
35.humane人道的
36.medical
technology医疗技术
37.anatomy解剖
38.equal公平的
39.unreliable不可信赖的
40.valid有效的、正当的
41.
be
convicted
for.被认定有罪
42.
using
live
animals
in
clinical
training
program用活动物做临床试验
100911
Some
people
think
it
is
necessary
to
use
animals
for
testing
medicines
intended
for
human
use.
Others,however,think
it
is
cruel
to
do
that.
Discuss
both
views
and
give
your
own
opinion.
1.
动物实验的合理性是一个极具争议的话题。
The
rationality
of
animals
experiment
is
one
of
the
most
debatable
topics
nowadays.
2.
有些人认为，用动物做医疗实验是很有必要的，目的是为人类所用；然而其他人认为此事很残忍。
There
are
some
people
who
argue
it
is
essential
to
test
medicines
by
using
animals
for
human
use,while
others
claim
that
it
is
bloody
to
per
that.
3.
这两种观点各有利弊。
There
are
advantages
and
disadvantages
for
both
of
the
arguments.
承
1.
用动物做医疗实验是很重要的一项医药研究方法。
Experiment
on
animals
is
an
essential
medicines
research
approach.
2.
人类可以获得大量的[临床]数据，因为这种实验更有效。
Human
could
obtain
a
great
quantity
of
clinical
data
as
the
experiment
seems
to
be
more
effective.
3.
比如说，医学家经常用小白鼠做实验，研究治疗癌症药物的有效性。Remedy
For
example,medicines
scientists
always
use
mice
to
conduct
experiments,researching
medicine’s
usefulness.
4.
如果让癌症病人尝试新药，风险很大，容易产生医疗事故。medical
negligence
If
cancer
patients
are
allowed
to
try
new
medicines,risking
significantly
and
easily
causing/leading
to
medical
negligence.
5.
进一步说，用白鼠做实验，可以降低实验成本，因为它们繁殖快，饲养方便。Multiply
Furthermore,testing
on
white
mice
may
contribute
to
the
decline
of
cost,as
they
multiply
quickly
as
well
as
being
raised
conveniently.
6.
可见，用动物于医药研究可提高效率、降低风险和成本。
Generally,using
animals
to
test
medicines
may
significantly
increase
efficiency
and
reduce
risks
and
costs.
转
1.
然而，因大量使用动物做药物实验，产生很多问题。
On
the
other
hand,as
lots
of
animals
are
used
to
test
medicines,there
are
many
problems.
2.
事实上，这种实验容易产生新的病毒。
In
fact,it
is
easy
to
produce
new
viruses
in
the
research
lab.
3.
据报道，很多流行感冒的爆发很可能源于这种医学实验。
It
is
reported
that
breaking
out
of
major
flu
probably
originates/comes/stems
from
medicines
researches.
4.
因此，环保主义者和动物保护者都一致反对这种实验，因为它的残酷。Defenders
of
Wildlife
Therefore,both
defenders
of
wildlife
and
environmentalists
oppose/are
against
this
kind
of
experiments
because
of
its
cruelty.
5.
他们认为，
人与动物都是大自然的重要组成部分，所以动物实验是违背自然规律的做法。
They
think
that
human
and
animals
are
important
components
of
nature,so
animal
experiments
are
against
natural
law.
动物权利活动者继续威胁恐吓对有争议的动物研究实验室所属的公司。
Animal
rights
activists
are
continuing
a
campaign
of
threats
and
intimidation
against
scores
of
companies
linked
to
the
controversial
animal
research
laboratory.
该公司合法进行医药试验The
firm
is
licensed
to
carry
out
testing
for
pharmaceutical
.
进行重要生物医药研究而不受到威胁或者骚扰to
conduct
vital
biomedical
research
research
without
being
harassed
and
threatened.“鼓励使用模拟技术取代活动物to
endorse
the
use
of
simulation
technologies
to
replace
live
animale
use
in
sergery
training
program
Further
reading:
Animal
Testing
Animal
testing
may
be
necessary,but
we
need
to
be
merciful
Every
year,millions
of
animals
undergo
painful
suffering
or
death
as
a
result
of
scientific
research
into
the
effects
of
drugs,food
additives,cosmetics
and
other
chemical
products.
While
most
people
think
animal
testing
is
necessary,others
are
upset
by
what
they
see
as
needless
suffering.
This
essay
looks
at
some
of
the
positive
and
negative
aspects
of
animal
testing.
Many
medical
treatments
and
procedures
have
been
developed
from
experiments
on
animals.
Since
animals
share
many
features
with
humans,scientists
use
animals
to
test
the
safety
and
effectiveness
of
newly
developed
drugs
before
pilot
testing
on
small
groups
of
patients.
Medical
teams
practice
new
operating
techniques
such
as
transplants
on
animals.
Without
animal
testing,many
procedures
or
new
drugs
would
be
extremely
unsafe.
However,many
people
are
concerned
that
animals
are
suffering
unnecessarily
and
cruelly.
They
do
not
believe
that
every
new
drug
needs
to
be
tested
on
animals,especially
with
the
huge
database
of
knowledge
and
modern
computer
models.
They
also
are
worried
that
many
animal
tests
are
ineffective,pointing
out
that
any
drugs
have
had
to
be
withdrawn
from
the
market
despite
extensive
testing.
They
particularly
feel
that
animal
testing
should
not
be
used
for
non-essential
products
such
as
cosmetics,shampoos,soaps,and
cleaning
products.
Furthermore,some
campaigners
would
like
to
see
certain
tests
replaced
and
more
humane
s
used.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
the
millions
of
animals
who
are
used
for
testing
new
products
are
treated
with
the
minimum
of
suffering.
Although
some
animal
testing
may
be
unavoidable
at
present,treating
our
fellow
creatures
as
mercifully
as
possible
will
demonstrate
our
humanity.
267
words
Animal
Testing
There
is
no
alternative
Every
day,thousands
of
people
are
saved
from
painful
diseases
and
death
by
powerful
medical
drugs
and
treatments.
This
incredible
gift
of
medicine
would
not
be
possible
without
animal
testing.
Despite
these
overwhelming
benefits,however,some
people
are
calling
for
animal
testing
to
be
banned
because
of
alleged
cruelty.
This
essay
will
examine
arguments
for
and
against
animal
testing.
Those
against
the
use
of
animal
testing
claim
that
it
is
inhumane
to
use
animals
in
experiments.
I
disagree
completely.
It
would
be
much
more
inhumane
to
test
new
drugs
on
children
or
adults.
Even
if
it
were
possible,it
would
also
take
much
longer
to
see
potential
effects,because
of
the
length
of
time
we
live
compared
to
laboratory
animals
such
as
rats
or
rabbits.
Opponents
of
animal
testing
also
claim
that
the
results
are
not
applicable
to
humans.
This
may
be
partly
true.
Some
drugs
have
had
to
be
withdrawn,despite
testing.
However,we
simply
do
not
have
alternative
s
of
testing.
Computer
models
are
not
advanced
enough,and
testing
on
plants
is
much
less
applicable
to
humans
than
tests
on
animals
such
as
monkeys.
Until
we
have
a
better
system,we
must
use
animal
testing.
A
further
point
often
raised
against
animal
testing
is
that
it
is
cruel.
Some
of
the
tests
certainly
seem
painful,but
the
great
majority
of
people
on
this
planet
eat
meat
or
wear
leather
without
any
guilt.
Where
is
their
sympathy
for
animals?
Furthermore,animals
clearly
do
not
feel
the
same
way
as
humans,and
scientists
are
careful
to
minimize
stress
in
the
animals,since
this
would
damage
their
research.
I
agree
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
animals
who
are
used
for
testing
new
products
have
the
minimum
of
suffering.
However,I
am
convinced
that
animal
testing
is
necessary,and
that
it
will
continue
to
benefit
humans
in
new
and
wonderful
ways.
311
words
Animal
Testing
Advantages
of
Animal
Testing
in
Medical
Research
Medical
research
involving
animals
has
dramatically
improved
the
health
of
the
human
race.
Without
animal
testing,the
cure
for
polio
would
not
exist
and
diabetics
would
suffer
or
die
from
their
disease.
Despite
these
benefits,some
people
believe
that
animals
should
be
not
be
used
for
testing
medical
techniques
and
drugs.
This
essay
will
outline
the
advantages
of
animal
testing.
Animal
testing
allows
scientists
to
test
and
create
new
drugs.
Animals
such
as
monkeys
or
rabbits
have
similar
physical
processes
to
humans.
This
allows
scientists
to
test
the
effects
of
certain
drugs.
If
a
drug
produces
adverse
effects
in
animals
it
is
probably
unfit
for
human
use.
Animal
testing
is
cheap.
There
is
a
large
supply
of
animals
for
medical
research.
Animals
are
easily
bred,and
maintained
safely
in
controlled
labs.
The
costs
of
testing
in
humans
would
be
extremely
high.
Many
people
argue
that
animal
testing
is
cruel.
In
some
cases
this
is
true.
However
it
would
be
much
more
cruel
to
test
new
drugs
on
people
or
children,or
to
let
people
die
because
there
was
not
enough
ination
about
a
drug.
Furthermore,legislation
in
most
countries
sets
standards
for
animal
treatment,and
laboratories
have
guidelines
to
prevent
cruelty.
Opponents
of
animal
research
also
say
that
ination
from
animals
does
not
apply
to
humans.
They
point
to
certain
commercial
drugs
which
have
been
withdrawn
because
of
side-effects
in
humans
While
it
is
true
that
animal
systems
differ
from
human
systems,there
are
enough
similarities
to
apply
ination
from
animals
to
humans.
Animal
rights
campaigners
claim
that
we
don’t
need
new
tests
because
we
already
have
vast
amounts
of
ination.
However,many
new
deadly
infections
appear
every
year
and
new
treatments
and
drugs
are
needed
to
combat
these
deadly
plagues.
Animal
testing
is
needed
in
the
world
we
live
in.
Our
responsibility
is
to
manage
the
animals
in
our
care
and
balance
their
suffering
against
the
good
that
comes
from
them.
321
words
The
Animal
Protection
Agency
(APA)
is
the
UK
organisation
committed
to
ceasing
the
trade
in
wildlife
for
pets.
Perhaps
unbelievably,it
is
still
legal
in
Britain
to
sell
wild
animals
captured
from
other
countries.
The
majority
of
wild-trapped
animals
die
from
the
stress
and
disease
that
is
associated
with
every
stage
of
their
harrowing
journey.
Next
to
habitat
destruction,collection
of
animals
for
the
pet
trade
is
the
main
reason
for
the
decline
in
many
species.
Attempts
to
regulate
and
control
the
trade
have
globally
failed.
The
problem
is
getting
worse,and
time
is
running
out!
This
site
contains
ination
on
who
we
are,our
current
campaigns
and
how
you
can
help
us
Animal
Protection
Agency
(APA)
Ltd
A
large
part
of
the
work
of
APA
is
to
lobby
对(议员等)进行游说(或疏通)
2.
施加压力(或影响)使(议案等)得以通过
for
improved
legislation
to
protect
animal
welfare.
We
oppose
the
activities
of
individuals
or
companies
involved
in
the
trade
in
wild
animals
as
pets
and
we
expose
the
wasteful
practices
and
consequences
of
the
wildlife
trade.
By
working
alongside
government
agencies
and
local
authorities,and
by
building
public
support
and
awareness,APA
seeks
to
end
the
cruel
confinement幽禁;监禁
of
wild
animals
as
pets.
Animal
Protection
Agency
(APA)
Foundation
The
Animal
Protection
Agency
Foundation
was
set
up
to
carry
out,or
commission,research
into
the
impacts
of
the
wildlife
trade
on
individual
animals,biodiversity
and
the
natural
environment,as
well
as
the
risks
of
infectious
disease
transmission
between
wildlife
and
people.
The
Foundation
conducts
awareness
raising
programmes
on
all
issues
concerning
the
trade
in
wild
animals
as
pets.
By
concentrating
resources
on
tackling着手对付(或处理)
the
exotic外来,外国产的
pet
trade,the
Animal
Protection
Agency
aims
to
achieve
real
and
lasting
results
for
animals
and
their
environments.
We
also
aim
to
help
protect
people
from
making
the
mistakes
of
acquiring
wild
animals
or
pet-linked
disease.
Staff
members
have
years
of
experience
in
campaigning
for
animal
protection
and
specifically
in
thwarting反对,阻挠;使受挫折;挫败
the
unlawful
activities
of
wild
animal
dealers.
Supporting
APA
Ltd
and
the
Foundation
is
an
integrated
team
of
scientific,veterinary兽医的
and
legal
advisors
that
includes
specialists
in
exotic
animal
welfare,conservation
and
public
health.